AIgile
Purpose-Built vs General-Purpose

Why purpose-built
beats general-purpose AI

Most organisations already have some form of general AI — Copilot, ChatGPT, or similar. AIgile exists because a tool built specifically for construction outperforms one built for everything else too — the way a scalpel built for surgery outperforms a Swiss Army knife.

Try it free →Talk to us
98.15%
Alignment with judicial outcomes
Independently validated on real Australian disputes
<5 min
To review a full construction contract
vs hours of manual review
~$36k
Legal value per contract
90 hrs of legal work delivered in minutes
1,100+
Australian construction cases in the dataset
Covering defects, payment, EOT, security & more
Same contract. Both platforms.

See the difference in the output

We ran the same AS4000 Special Conditions contract through both. No text can say it better than the output itself.

Microsoft Copilot — Contract Risk Analysis
AIgile — Contract Risk Scanner

A. Contractor "All‑Risk" Warranty

Contractor warrants it has examined all risks, contingencies, site conditions, buildability and constructability. Contractor relies solely on its own investigation, not Principal‑supplied info (including geotechnical).

AS4000 difference: AS4000 allows latent condition relief and does not include an "entire reliance" disclaimer of this breadth.

Cost implication: Include full contingency for ground conditions, interface risks, design/buildability inefficiencies.

Typically 5–10% uplift depending on project uncertainty.

B. No‑Reliance on Principal Information

All "information documents" at contractor's risk. Geotechnical data is factual only; variation between bores is Contractor risk.

AS4000 difference: AS4000 latent conditions regime provides relief. Quantified cost risk: Unforeseen ground remediation, dewatering, over‑excavation, redesign.

Potential cost exposure: $250k–$2m+ on mid‑size civil projects (~1–10% Contract Sum).

C. Rise and Fall – Mostly Eliminated

Alternative 1 selected: no rise and fall.

Cost exposure example: Labour/material inflation at 4–6% p.a. On $18.75m contract over 2 years → $750k–$1.1m unrecoverable.

↓ 600+ more words continue in the same format…
Overall Risk
HIGH
4 High · 3 Med · 1 Low
Est. Exposure
$1.5M–$2.9M
Across all categories
LD Rate
$12,500/day
Weather NOT an EOT trigger
Severity
Category & Description
VS AS4000
Est. Impact
Clause
● HIGH
Time & Delay
Strict 10-business-day notice bar for EOT (cl. 34.3). Failure to notify bars ALL entitlement.
Worse$56,250–$112,500Clause 34.3
● HIGH
Variation & Scope Creep
Lump sum with no rise-and-fall. Superintendent values using star rates capped at Department rates.
Worse$850,000–$1,275,000Cl. 2.1A, 36.4
● HIGH
Liability & Indemnity
Contractor indemnifies Principal for ALL WHS costs on or adjacent to site. Unlimited exposure.
Worse$50,000–$500,000+Clause 12.3.2
● HIGH
Payment & Cash Flow
Progress claims require statutory declarations. Broad set-off rights — no notice required.
Worse$37,500–$150,000Cl. 37.1, 37.4
● MEDIUM
Ground & Site Risk
Contractor warrants full site investigation. No latent conditions relief. Geotechnical at contractor risk.
Worse$250,000–$2,000,000Clause 12.1
● MEDIUM
Security & Set-Off
Security 5% ($937,500). Principal may call without establishing quantum or giving notice.
Worse$937,500 exposureClause 5
+ Weather Risk Analysis tab · Contract Chatbot included

Why it matters

Beyond the output itself — how AIgile is built, and why that's cheaper and simpler for you.

Copilot wasn't built for this

It's great at emails and slide decks. It was never trained on or validated against Australian construction law — ask it about a latent conditions clause and you get something plausible, not something checked.

Purpose-built for this domain

Australian construction has its own statutes, standard forms, and case law. AIgile is built around them — a generalist model treats your contract like any other document.

Output you can hand someone

Structured risk registers, quantified exposure, clause references, client-ready reports — not a wall of text you still have to organise yourself.

Your data, organised by project

Every document lives in its own dashboard, sorted by project and contract — not mixed into a general assistant handling everything else in your org.

Cost-efficient by design

Simple tasks get fast, cheap models. Complex analysis gets a more capable one. You never pay a flat rate for basic work.

We keep it current, so you don't have to

New AI models emerge every few months. Building your own system is doable — maintaining it isn't. That ongoing cost is ours, not yours.

Pay for outcomes, not open access

A blanket AI seat gets burned on emails and rewrites. AIgile is scoped to work that pays for itself — risk analysis, disputes, notices.

One read, shared by the whole team

Five people uploading the same contract into five chats wastes time and money. AIgile reads it once — for everyone on the project.

Try it yourself

Your competitor has Copilot.
Now you have AIgile.

Stop letting generalist AI tell you what you already know. Get structured, validated, construction-specific analysis — in minutes, not hours.

Our pilot partners are already using AIgile to assess tender contracts before they commit — while others spend thousands on legal advice for work they may not win.

Try AIgile freeTalk to us
Four tools. Every stage.
Before you sign
Contract Risk Scanner
Full risk register with $ exposure per clause, benchmarked against AS4000.
Before you sign
Clause Advisor
Compare subcontract clauses against your own historically agreed positions and flag anything that differs.
During the job
Smart Contract Administrator
Ask anything about your contract, draft notices, and collaborate on them with your team — track changes, comment on specific wording, and route notices for approval before they go out.
When it goes wrong
Dispute Assessor
98.15% accuracy vs judicial outcomes. Know where you stand before you spend.